The survey was conducted
through face-to-face interviews with 1,226 respondents throughout Kosovo between
08 and 26 August 2005. The objective of the survey was to measure the Kosovo
residents' perceptions and knowledge of the justice sector, including specific
legal issues, actors and the court system.
The 2005 Kosovo public opinion survey
reveals that while there has been a general increase in information about legal
and judicial matters, a large segment of the population in Kosovo is still not
informed about key elements of the legal and judicial system in the
country.
The second report "Measuring and Improving Citizens'
Understanding of the Justice System: Survey of Attitudes towards the Judicial
System among Court Users in Kosovo" details the findings from a
first-of-it's-kind survey of citizens in Kosovo who have filed a case with the
country's district or municipal courts. USAID commissioned this survey to gauge
court users' attitudes on a variety of issues dealing with the courts
specifically and the judicial system more broadly.
Findings in the 2005 survey with court users include: Moderate
levels of trust in judicialinstitutions: Court users express a fair amount
rather than a great deal of trust in the courts; the police are among the
officials most trusted by
court users. There is moderate trust in the legal
system to maintain law and order and to protect rights.
Corruption perceived to be common: Most court users believe
corruption is at least somewhat common - especially among lawyers and judges and
much less so among court registrars. The most cited source of corruption is
payments made by ordinary people to push their case in their favor. General lack
of knowledge amongcourt users: There are low levels of knowledge about the court
system and its basic procedures, including how to register a case or how to
appeal a decision.
This survey was conducted through
face-to-face interviews between August 2005 and October 2005 with 403 persons
who have had experience with Kosovo's court system. More specifically,
interviews were conducted with 124 criminal defendants, 36 victims in criminal
cases, 25 lawyers who represented victims, 99 civil case defendants and 119
plaintiffs in civil cases.